UPDATED THURSDAY - NOV. 20, 2008
DR. JAMES D. MANNING - MOST SHOCKING VIDEO I HAVE SEEN
NO SALES TAX TO BUY GUNS IN S.C. - VIDEO
http://www.wjbf.com/jbf/news/state_regional/south_carolina/article/south_carolina_to_have_tax_free_holiday_for_gun_sales/8754/
DR. JAMES D. MANNING - MUST SEE NOW
DR. JAMES D. MANNING - MUST SEE NOW
Bush Hands Over Reins of U.S. Economy to EU | ||
| ||
The results of the G-20 economic summit amount to nothing less than the seamless integration of the United States into the European economy.
In one month of legislation and one diplomatic meeting, the United States has unilaterally abdicated all the gains for the concept of free markets won by the Reagan administration and surrendered, in total, to the Western European model of socialism, stagnation, and excessive government regulation.
Sovereignty is out the window. Without a vote, we are suddenly members of the European Union. Given the dismal record of those nations at creating jobs and sustaining growth, merging with the Europeans is like a partnership with death. | ||
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
"I am an illegal alien"
Obama is not qualified to be senator or president of the United States. With this information made freely available, any elector who now votes for Obama can be found guilty of treason, a crime that can be punished by life in prison or death by firing squad. -mjy
Obama Ignores Court on Birthplace
Obama and DNC Admit All Allegations
Request for Admissions is Admitted
How could an illegal alien win an illegal election? Like this.
Supremes to review Barack's citizenship
Case challenging his name on ballot set for 'conference'
Posted: November 20, 2008
1:10 am Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
A case that challenges President-elect Barack Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot citing questions over his citizenship has been scheduled for a "conference" at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Conferences are private meetings of the justices at which they review cases and decide which ones to accept for formal review. This case is set for a conference Dec. 5, just 10 days before the Electoral College is scheduled to meet to make formal the election of Obama as the nation's next president.
The Supreme Court's website listed the date for the case brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the secretary of state in New Jersey, over not only Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot but those of two others, Sen. John McCain and Roger Calero.
.......................................................................................................................................
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Supreme Court to Review Obama's Citizenship on Dec 5th
Why is it that the media is not reporting this huge issue and investigation? The American people are clueless sheep....
A case that challenges President-elect Barack Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot citing questions over his citizenship has been scheduled for a "conference" at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Conferences are private meetings of the justices at which they review cases and decide which ones to accept for formal review. This case is set for a conference Dec. 5, just 10 days before the Electoral College is scheduled to meet to make formal the election of Obama as the nation's next president.
The Supreme Court's website listed the date for the case brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the secretary of state in New Jersey, over not only Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot but those of two others, Sen. John McCain and Roger Calero.
Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others filed a court petition in California asking the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office.
The disputes all cite "natural-born citizen" requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=8148
**********************************************************************************************
GOP congressman: 'It is not your money'
Michigan lawmaker trying to help Detroit makes stunning statement about tax dollars
Posted: November 19, 2008
7:58 pm Eastern
By Joe Kovacs
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
A Republican congressman seeking a $25 billion bailout of the troubled U.S. auto industry made a stunning statement about taxpayer funds to benefit Detroit, claiming, "It is not your money."
Rep. Joe Knollenberg, R-Mich., made the remark during a discussion with Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto yesterday as the pair debated sending billions of federal dollars to prop up the Big Three carmakers.
Cavuto asked Knollenberg: "When the housing industry CEOs come to you and say, 'You know, [if] we go under and all the ancillary businesses – the dishwasher manufacturers, the washer-and-dryer manufacturers, the Lowe's and the Home Depots that vastly depend on our being alive and vibrant – if we go under, there's hell to pay. And then the textile manufacturer comes to you and says, 'If we go down, there's hell to pay.' And on and on and on we go. Where do you draw the line with our money?"
"It is not your money," said Knollenberg.
Cavuto screamed back, "It is! It is taxpayers money!"
Knollenberg claimed dealers are not selling cars right now because "there's no credit to get."
He explained, "If we could just remove that problem, and this is what we're trying to do, then we'd be in the position to sell cars."
***********************************************************************************************
FATHER DON'T CRY
PREVIOUS BLOG - YOU MUST SEE
http://actionsbyt.blogspot.com/2008/11/change-many-voted-for.html
......................................................................................................................................................................
(Getty Images)
America just had a boatload of oil stolen—a big one. The U.S. Fifth Fleet knows where the ship is, and it knows who stole it. But it isn’t doing much about it—it isn’t allowed to. If he were alive, Admiral Perry would be pulling out his hair. Why won’t America use its power?
Somali pirates captured a fully-laden Saudi supertanker off the coast of the East African nation of Kenya this past Saturday. The giant oil tanker, carrying the equivalent of one quarter of Saudi Arabia’s daily oil output—2 million barrels of oil—was en route to the United States via a section of ocean actively patrolled by the U.S. Navy.
In all fairness, the Fifth Fleet is attempting to police an area four times the size of Texas. Yet, the hijacking did catch naval officials off guard. “This is unprecedented,” said Lt. Nathan Christensen, a Navy spokesman. “It’s three times the size of an aircraft carrier.” At over 318,000 deadweight tons, the supertanker is the largest ship ever captured by pirates.
Back in the U.S., Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he was “stunned” that the pirates succeeded in pulling off such a capture so far from the coast.
“Certainly we’ve seen an extraordinary rise” of attacks, Mullen said. “I am extremely concerned by the overall number.”
Pirates in speedboats, armed with heavy machine guns and grenade launchers, have been wreaking havoc in the Gulf of Aden, regularly plundering merchant ships over the past two years and especially the past few months. This latest seizure suggests their range has vastly increased.
The pirates are “very good at what they do,” says Mullen. “They’re very well armed. Tactically, they are very good.” The incidence of ship seizures is way up, he says. The National Post puts the number at well over 60 for this year. In September, pirates seized a ship that, among other military hardware, was carrying 33 battle tanks.
According to Mullen, little can be done now that the pirates have the tanker—and hostages. In June, the United Nations said it would allow the U.S. to enter Somali waters when in pursuit of pirates. But that is of little value at present. Once a ship has been captured, countries and shipping companies often prefer to pay the pirates off as opposed to risk damage to their ships or the lives of their crew.
So America will wait for payment negotiations. Then, if the talks proceed as other recent ransom negotiations have, in three or so months the ship may be again heading for the U.S.
According to military sources, the ship is heading toward Eyl, a well-known pirate stronghold in Somalia that is harboring several other captured ships being similarly ransomed.
But the fact that a known pirate stronghold is allowed to exist is a condemning indictment of America in intself.
After the British incident last year in which the Iranian Navy’s kidnapping of British sailors went unretaliated, the world knew the British Royal Navy had become impotent. It appears America is in the same boat—a long way off from the America that men like Theodore Roosevelt presided over.
America has the most dominant, technologically advanced navy in the world. The navy knows where the hijacked ship is, it has a good idea of who the pirates are, and it even has UN permission to enter Somali waters. And the oil was on its way to America.
At the very least, Admiral Perry would have anchored the fleet in Eyl and not left until he had the crew and the cargo—and the pirates.
The cause of America’s broken will can be found here and here. •
A LESSON IN HUMILITY FROM G-D
(do you believe me now ??)
LEVITICUS CHAPTER 26 - VERSE 19, 20
***********************************************************************************************
NEVER FORGET WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO SEE - IT CAN HAPPEN AGAIN
.............................................................................................................
Ayers: It was 'stupid' to honor Sirhan Sirhan
Dedicated communist manifesto to Robert F. Kennedy's assassin
Posted: November 18, 2008
9:27 pm Eastern
By Alyssa Farah
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
 |
WASHINGTON – Bill Ayers, the former Weather Underground extremist with extensive links to president-elect Barack Obama, dedicated his book to Sirhan Sirhan, Robert F. Kennedy's assassin, then denied it, then admitted it and now says maybe it wasn't the right thing to do.
Ayers dedicated his 1974 book, "Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism," to "political prisoners," specifically listing Sirhan Sirhan, the man who was found guilty of murdering Kennedy during the 1968 presidential campaign. Sirhan was given a life sentence.
WND previously reported Ayers' decision to dedicate the book to the killer.
However, when asked about the dedication at a book signing, Ayers said recently, "Absolutely, that wasn't a dedication."
************************************************************************************************
281 565 6977
www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com
www.tjofsugarland.blogspot.com
************************************************************************
This full-page ad appeared today in the Washington Times National Weekly (Monday November 17th edition) It will hit subscribers' mailboxes on Tuesday.
Former Obama opponent now suing to prove President-elect's citizenship
By Rich Rogers rrogers@nbcaugusta.com and NBC Augusta Staff
SACRAMENTO, Calif.- A former opponent of Barack Obama's has come back to haunt him over questions regarding Obama's citizenship.
According to a press release from the American Independent Party, former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and other members of the party have filed suit in California Superior Court in Sacramento to stop the state from giving its electoral votes to President-elect Barack Obama until documentary evidence is provided to prove Obama is indeed a natural born citizen of the United States. A copy of the writ can be found here.
THE OBAMA EXAMPLE
Posted: November 19, 2008
1:00 am Eastern
© 2008
Next time you move to another state and need a new driver's license, try this: Refuse to produce the birth certificate or any other personal information required by the department of motor vehicles. Just explain that a facsimile of the required document is posted on your website and give the clerk the domain name.
Tell them: "I'm following the example of President-elect Barack Obama. If he didn't need to produce a birth certificate to establish his eligibility to be president of the United States, why would you require me to produce one to get a lousy driver's license?"
See if it flies.
Your new employer requests a Social Security number he can provide the Internal Revenue Service so the federal government can be sure to grab its share of your money before you ever get a chance to touch it or see it, let alone spend it. Just explain that it would be an invasion of your privacy to give it to the company for identification purposes because your Social Security number was never intended for that purpose by act of Congress.
Tell them: "I'm following the example of President-elect Barack Obama. If he didn't need to produce a birth certificate to establish his eligibility to be president of the United States, surely you cannot require me to produce a Social Security card to be employed."
************************************************************************************************
IS THIS THE CHANGE THE "MORONS" VOTED FOR ??
 |  | |
| By Gene J. Puskar, AP | ||
| ||
| GMC SUVs sit at a dealership in Dormont, Pa., Nov. 11. | ||
