Thursday, May 17, 2007

MOUSEGUNS AGAIN

WELCOME TO THE NO BS ZONE OF TEDDY JACOBSON

UPDATED 5-19-07

www.firearmstalk.com.

www.armedfemalesofamerica.com



I AM GOING TO WRITE AND PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ABOUT MOUSE GUNS. THESE ARE MY OPINIONS ONLY AND I FORGOT MORE THAN MOST PEOPLE KNOW. THIS IS A DISCLAIMER AS TO MY OPINIONS AND MY COMMENTS. THE MORE THEY MENTION MY NAME ON THE NAA MESSAGE BOARD THE MORE TRUTH I WILL SHARE WITH YOU. I DO LIKE THE NAA MINI REVOLVERS, I ALWAYS HAVE BUT I CAN NOT RECOMMEND THE NAA GUARDIAN AT THIS TIME. THEY HAVE KNOWN ABOUT ITS FAILURES BUT DID NOTHING FOR YEARS BECAUSE THEY WANTED "SALES" AND NOW THEY HAVE LITTLE OR NONE TO SELL BECAUSE OF THEIR REDESIGN PROJECT AND IT STILL IS QUESTIONABLE IN MY MIND IF THEY WILL DO WHATS RIGHT.

IF YOU WANT A SMALL MOUSE GUN TO CARRY AS A SECOND OR THIRD BACK UP GUN YOU CAN SAFELY BUY A KEL-TEC OR A TOMCAT OR A NAA MINI REVOLVER IN 22 MAGNUM. DO NOT BECOME AN EXPERIMENT FOR SOME BS STORY ABOUT A REDESIGN, THIS IS MY PERSONAL OPINION. A GUN SHOULD BE ON THE MARKET FOR 2 YEARS BEFORE YOU BUY ANY NEW MODEL TO SEE ITS PROS AND CONS.

WHAT ABOUT THE POOR SCHMUCKS THAT ARE STUCK WITH THE OLD DESIGN THAT JAMS BECAUSE OF INITIAL DEFECTS AND PISS POOR SPRINGS. WILL THESE PEOPLE BE COMPENSATED, OR WILL THEY HAVE A BUY BACK OR TRADE UP PROGRAM AT MINIMUM COST TO THE GUN OWNER. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT AS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT YOUR LIFE. GUNS ARE TO PROTECT LIFE AND PROPERTY AND THESE MOUSE GUNS AS A RULE HAVE A LIFE EXPECTENCY OF SO MANY ROUNDS.

SIGHTS - YOU DO NOT NEED NIGHT SIGHTS ON A MOUSE GUN THAT IS INTENDED FOR UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL SURVIVAL LIKE TWO OR THREE FEET. IF YOU DO NOT LIKE WHAT I AM SAYING THEN GET THE HELL OFF MY SITE AND GO BACK TO YOUR FANTASY WORLD OF BS AND NONSENSE. I AM TRYING TO HELP YOU BY TAKING THE HEAT TO TELL THE TRUTH AS VERY FEW PEOPLE WILL AT THIS TIME. ITS ALL ABOUT "BENJAMIN FRANKLIN"...

I HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO EXPRESS MY PERSONAL OPINION ABOUT ANYTHING. DO NOT BELIEVE HALF THE BS ON THESE PUBLIC WEBSITES AS THEY ALL HAVE AN AGENDA. TALK TO SOME ONE LIKE ME THAT REALLY IS SUPER HONEST AND HAS SEEN AND WORKED ON THE INTERNALS OF A HANDGUN. THESE PEOPLE THAT POST ARE JUST LOOKING FOR THEIR 10 MINUTES OF FAME IN A FANTASY WORLD.

WHEN PEOPLE BS ME OR LIE TO ME ONE TIME I CUT THEM OUT OF MY LIFE FOREVER. THIS IS TRUE, THOSE THAT PLAY IT STRAIGHT WITH ME HAVE A TRUSTED FRIEND. ITS THAT SIMPLE.

The very best way to have a fixed barrel attached to a frame is like the design of the Makarov. This way if the chamber and or the rifling is bad you can just replace the fixed barrel. Having a barrel cast with the frame is a big mistake. This is again my honest opinion. In the case of the GUARDIAN if the barrel is bad you must also replace the frame as it is a one piece casting. In my opinion this is nothing I would ever do. The Russian designer of the MAKAROV was a "GENIUS"...


Beretta 22 semi auto video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QCgDsHSTyk


.....................................................................................

The P32 is the BEST .32cal pistol!!


Post new topic Reply to topic The Kel-Tec Range Forum Index -> P-32




PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:36 pm Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, it's Flyer to the defense... of the Beretta!
The Tomcat is NO POS. Heavy and bulky, yup. Beautifully made and reliable, yup!
It's the truth... the Beretta isn't supposed to have an extractor. It doesn't NEED one. Once the slide's back, there's no ejection port to toss the case through... just wide blue sky above. The case forcing the slide to the rear provides plenty of force for the ejector to knock it out of the way.
And, since the Beretta has the tilting barrel, there's no need for an extractor to un-chamber a round, either... just let the barrel up and dump it into your hand!
In the case of a pistol having a full slide unlike the Beretta, it's lack of an ejector IS a BAD idea.
I'd say the two pistols serve slightly different roles.
The Beretta is easier to use for women particularly, since it can be loaded/unloaded without need for physical strength, i.e., racking the slide. It's got more gripping area, and makes a nice 'house' mousegun.
For CCW, there's no question... the P-32 is the best choice. Nothing is as flat or as light.
But, I don't consider the Beretta a bad gun at all... in fact, if I DID, I'd be a total jackass for giving my mother a Titanium one with a front night sight for her bedroom nightstand!
Flyer

_________________
My YouTube channel.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address

o
K



Location: Redneck Country

PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:30 am Post subject: Aha! By Jove! Reply with quote

Ole Flyer knows his stuff! I conseede on the Beretta. Never fired one, only looked it over, so really can't say. But the short barrel length does concern me as far as hollowpoint expansion goes. We didn't get too gooda results with the P32 a few years ago with JHP's in the wetpack test so a shorter barrel isn't gonna help. And remember Goldenloki's data kinda said the same thing with gelatin. http://www.goldenloki.com/ammo/gel/32acp/gel32acp.htm
But maybe CorBon's hot stuff (I hate it) might still expand in the Beretta since it did pretty good in the P32, as I remember.
But then, I think we all agreed a long time ago that FMJ's were the best way to go in .32cal short barrels, like the P32, anyway.

Here is one of the finest web pages anywhere on .32acp JHP expansion......

http://stevespages.com/page8f32acp.html

He has a excellent table down the page for the P32 with factory loadings. Best I've ever seen.
Later, when I get time, I'm going to try and duplicate Ricciardelli's water jug test with the P32 and Win Silvertip ammo. His tests were all with the longer barrel Walther so it'll be interesting to see what happens with a P32. Only drawback is the jugs are only good for one shot. Hard to draw a statistic with only one data point! We'll see.

In the meantime, thanks, Flyer, for all you do.

Cheers,
og

_________________
Older Than Dirt and Dumber Than A Geico CaveMan Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

B
K
WA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 1:21 am Post subject: Reply with quote

what Flyer said ^^

The Tomcat is a great little gun. Better in a purse than a pocket with that thick little grip, but I'm sure not ashamed to carry it when in the woods. The P-32 is a much better concealment gun, at a cheaper price, but it's not exactly a sweetheart to shoot. In fact we bought a P-32 for my Mom to carry concealed; only had it for a day or two until she fired it, and then we traded it in on the Beretta. I do wish it had a slide lock though, but with its system of recoil springs in the grips, I don't think one would fit in there without adding even more thickness.

_________________
Currently Kel-Tecless
.....................................................................................................................

The Tiniest Guns: Second Edition,
By Bob Urso

Cover art

The first edition of "The Tiniest Guns" was put together with the help of many collectors to fill a need for information on 2mm pinfire, rimfire and Berloque pistols. It was only 64 pages.

The new, revised Second Edition has doubled in size to 128 pages, and over 500 images. All of the chapters have been expanded, and there is much new information on the guns of Austria, Austrian Rifles, Austrian Revolvers, Austrian Automatics, France & Belgium Revolvers, Germany, German Revolvers, German Rifles, Japan, Japanese Rifles, Mexico, U.S.A., Unmarked, Customized & One of a Kind, Cases, Ammunition, Patents, Bibliography, Miniature Arms Collectors/Makers Society, Index.

In the second edition, I've added much more information for novice and experienced makers of miniature guns. There are drawings, plans, diagrams and patent drawings of many of the major styles of guns. And there is a new 12 page chapter on "Making Your First Pinfire", which has step by step instructions on how to make a pinfire using simple tools.


Below are some sample pages.Click on any page for a larger view.

page 6-7 ....p22-23 ....[4--41 .... p44-45 ....p60-61 ....p76-77 ...p90-91 ...p102

The Tiniest Guns: Second Edition - By Bob Urso
is $17.50 a copy plus $2.50 shipping. Add $2 postage for each additional book (email me for shipping charges outside the U.S.). Send checks, made out to Bob Urso, to;

    Bob Urso
    1806 Samish Way
    Bellingham, WA 98229
Checks are held until they clear, PayPal, Money Orders and Cashiers checks get next day shipping.

I can be contacted by email at boburso@attbi.com

A few copies of the first edition are still available for you serious collectors out there. The Price is $10. $12 Postpaid to the U.S., or add $1.25 postage if it is being shipped with a copy of the Second Edition







..........................................................................................................................

Beretta

Beretta Tomcat .32
by Gary G. Nass

Let me begin by saying that I fully expected some kind of malfunction with the gun. After all, it is a brand new pistol that has already suffered a recall because of serious failure to feed problems. But now, two months later, and after the forth delay, the Tomcat is out. I fired 50 rounds of Winchester 71 gr. FMJ and 55 rounds of Winchester 60 gr. Silvertip HP without a single malfunction of any kind. The gun performed flawlessly! Time will tell if this reliability trend continues, but it's a heck of a start. I would also like to point out that I fired almost all of the Silvertips from a fully loaded 7 round magazine to insure proper feeding from top to bottom. With an eighth bullet in the chamber via the tip-up barrel, you have the option of shooting the first round double action without having to rack the slide, or you can thumb-cock the hammer for all single action fire. The small slide pulled back easily with the help of about 13 grooves at the rear. The safety is frame mounted and easily manipulated with the thumb.

So what about accuracy? I was told by my dealer not to expect too much from this little gun. It has a very short barrel and small, all matte sights - notch in the rear and a blade up front with no dots to line up. No problem, the piece is meant for close range work where aiming isn't likely anyway. Now that I had my excuses lined up, I was ready to shoot. I used a 25 yard slow-fire pistol target with a 9.5" outer ring, taped to the heart area of a torso size cardboard silhouette. (Before I reveal the results of my shooting, let me stress that I am no Annie Oakley. I am normally a fair shot on a very good day.) At 7 yards and 1 shot/second deliberate aiming, my worst groups were always within about a 5" area. My best group to this point at 7 yards was 8 shots in 1.5" with the Silvertips. Most of the groups were low/left of center, but within the 6 ring. I moved the target out to 50 feet to see if I could qualify at that range with this little gun. I put 5 out of 7 in a 2.5" group with two flyers, the farthest being 7" from the group.

Okay, I took a moment to regain consciousness and decided to try some "real-life" drills. At ranges varying from 7 to 15 feet I "point-shot" rapid fire two to the body (vital area) one to the head successfully 5 out of 7 times. Once I nipped the left ear, and once I missed the head by about 2", again to the right of the left ear.

My hour was about up, and my target was full of tape, so I decided to take seven last shots at the head from 25'. I keyholed 4 out of 7 in a 1.25" group, and left the range more than satisfied.

Just a couple final comments: The two types of ammo I used both performed comparably, the only clear difference being the appearance of the hole it left in the paper. I expect more manufacturers to come out with a .32 round soon. I hear Hornady and Cor-Bon are ready to go with competition for Winchester. It will be tough to beat the performance of the silvertips though.

Although I wore hearing protection, it was obvious that the blast was considerably more than a .22, I would estimate it to be comparable to a light .38 round. Recoil was minimal, and made follow up shots fast and easy. (Probably a major contributing factor to my accuracy improvement, considering my other two handguns are a .357 snubbie and a .45)

Only two minor complaints: My double action first shots tended to end up about 6" below point of aim. The double action trigger pull seemed a little heavy, but I usually do pull down in double action anyway. Also in double action shots, the bottom of the trigger crowds my finger a bit, but in single action the trigger is perfect. Secondly, after 105 shots, my grips are a little loose, but I think I'll overlook that and keep the gun - real close.

I'm looking forward to hearing the reviews of other Tomcat owners as they receive this fine little Beretta.


MUST SEE VIDEO - GUN CONFISCATION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

INTERESTING VIDEOS TO SEE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVfwFP_RwTQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Va1TXGSCXk


www.mybenefitsplus.com/jjacobson

www.actionsbyt.com

www.commentsbyt.blogspot.com

www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com

www.tacticalknives.blogspot.com

www.actionsbyt.typepad.com

www.actionsbyt.wordpress.com

www.tjofsugarland.blogspot.com


www.nicindustries.com

http://www.spw-duf.info/links.html#guns

www.hipowersandhandguns.com


www.mouseguns.com

http://www.sequiam.com/products/

http://www.flashlightreviews.com/index1.html

http://www.shootersolutions.com/teddyjacobson.html

www.crimsontrace.com

http://www.gunsmithforum.com/


www.militec-1.com

http://www.magpul.com/

www.ismi-gunsprings.com

www.wolffgunsprings.com


www.trippresearch.com

www.cdnninvestments.com

www.survivalblog.com

www.lightningarms.com

www.brownells.com

www.ammoman.com

www.mscdirect.com

http://www.midwayusa.com/

www.coldsteel.com


www.davidstahr.com

www.wowtexas.com


www.jtf.org

http://gogumogog.com/


www.kolisrael.com


www.rabbiyess.com

http://yearsofawe.blogspot.com/

www.thetrumpet.com

www.worldnetdaily.com

www.michaelsavage.com

http://www.secretarmies.com/links.html


www.staceydean.org

www.brightguy.com

www.ufowatchdog.com

www.whatreallyhappened.com


Wednesday, May 16, 2007

SW "J" Frame Revolver

Getting a Grip…on J-frames!

By Stephen Camp

www.hipowersandhandguns.com

"Grip" actually refers to the grasping of the handgun by the shooter. The "handles" are more accurately called "stocks", but the term "grip" is most commonly used. In this discussion I will use the more common term.

With the small frame S&W snubs, we find a handgun intended to be concealed as either a primary or backup weapon. Sights don't come close to those used for target work and the original grips were meant to aid in the gun's diminutive size.

This S&W Model 442 is wearing the old classic Smith & Wesson J-frame round butt grips. For years these were common trim on the little pocket revolver.

The classic J-frame walnut grips are easy to conceal and do not lend themselves to "printing" if the gun is worn in a belt holster under the jacket. They are also small enough to allow for dropping into a jacket pocket or via a pocket holster. They are also prone to allowing the gun to shift during recoil, particularly in rapid-fire. I have never been able to do my best using these grips. They cover neither the front or rear grip straps and are the same width and height as the gun's frame. Everything that could be done was done to make the gun as "invisible" as possible. Unfortunately, controllability suffered. The only concession to aiding stability was that the grips were checkered.

I find the smooth classic S&W grip considerably less controllable than the more common checkered grips. They do look very nice, but simply do not lend themselves to the most efficient handling of the revolver.

A common and still surprisingly good solution to this malady comes in the form of a "grip adapter." For years Smith & Wesson, Pachmayr, and Tyler offered these add on parts. I know that Tyler still does today.

Installation is simple; loosen the grips and slide the metal tabs at the rear of the grip adapter between them and the frame. Tighten the grip screws and you're done.

This Tyler grip adapter adds no width to the gun. It does allow for a much more secure grip on the snub during firing and the revolver doesn't shift as much in the hand with heavy loads. These are still available. I've used such an arrangement for years and know at least one current law enforcement officer who does the same today. If you prefer the "classic look" but want more control when shooting, this has proven a viable solution for me.

For those interested in grip adapters, Tyler Manufacturing has a site located at: http://www.t-grips.com/

The problem is that grip adapters can cost as much as some entire sets of synthetic grips! These are offered for both square and round butt frames as well as J, K, L, and N-frame S&W revolvers.

Not normally seen these days are the old Fitz Gunfightergrips for the J-frame. Certainly not "tactical" in looks, they do offer very good control of the snub in slow or quick shooting. They are thicker than the standard grips and cover the front grip strap. This does the same thing as the grip adapter. They are also longer than the gun's butt and do slightly increase overall size.

This picture lets you see the increased length and slightly increased width of these synthetic stocks. Despite the "retro" look, the Fitz Gunfighter does allow for very, very good control of the gun. These have not been made since the '70's and do not work too well with speedloaders; they work fine with speed strips, however.

It is my view that the J-frame snub best serves as a concealed carry gun. For me these grips are just a bit large for pocket carry. For use with either an IWB or conventional belt holster, they present no problems. For a snub carried primarily in the glove box or for home defense, their size is a non-issue. They do tame much of the little Airweight Smith's buck!

Some grips cover both the front and rear grip straps. This one also extends below the gun's butt. The revolver is also a bit longer as the grip extends more rearward. This might aid the shooter having extremely large hands or long fingers, but it reduces the J's primary strength: concealability.

This set of Uncle Mike's replacement grips are similar to the wood ones discussed previously. While I actually prefer rubber or synthetic grips for pocket carry, I do not find these particularly comfortable and they do make the revolver harder to conceal.

Obviously, some sort of compromise is in order. We need a grip that offers adequate control, but we also do not want to unduly sacrifice the ability to conceal.

The grip at the far left is the K-frame round butt service grip from S&W. The center grip is rapidly approaching its size, but for a considerably smaller gun that holds one less round. As the butt is normally the hardest part of the handgun to effectively conceal, I'd just as soon carry the larger gun. The grip at the right is from Uncle Mike's and is an approved copy of Craig Spegel's boot grip. The front of the grip mimics the Tyler grip adapter while the grip does not cover the rear strap. It is no longer than the gun's grip frame and relatively thin. Being rubber, it is not stained by sweat after daily pocket carry in hot climates. I have experienced no problems with this grip for pocket carry. It works fine with speedloaders.

As you may have guessed, I prefer the Uncle Mike rubber boot grip to all others. I've found it to provide both comfort and control and it has proven durable over several years of daily carry. They are not nearly so nice as the original wooden boot grips from Mr. Spegel, but neither do they cost as much.

The Uncle Mike's boot grip has been standard on the S&W J-frame .38's for several years now and this is one decision that S&W has made that I agree with.

The most petite grips I've found that offer sufficient control in firing are from Eagle Grips. Here are their Secret Service grips for the J-frame round butt. I find these better than the original S&W grips in either rapid or slow-fire and they are no harder to control. They cover the front strap, but not the rear and they do not extend below the gun's frame at all. I do not find them more comfortable than the Uncle Mike's boot grip.

Here is a closer view of the Eagle Secret Service grip. It, too, works fine with speedloaders.

So which is best? I cannot say which is best for another person, but have tried to point out strong and weak points (as I see them) on the several types of grips available for the snub. What feels best to me possibly will not to the next guy…or gal. It remains my opinion that for a "carry gun", the wisest choice remains grips that offer comfort, adequate control in firing, and concealability. For the J-frame not primarily carried, it makes no difference. However, in such cases I suggest going to a weapon that offers advantages that the J-frame does not. Without exception, my J's are the aluminum frame Airweight version. These are superb for carry, but reduced weight does mean more felt recoil. I find their lightweight to be significantly more comfortable for pocket carry. While they are not as light as some newer offerings, neither are there limitations on what ammunition can be used without causing the gun to malfunction. I can use my preferred LSWCHP +P ammunition without worry that a bullet will unseat, protrude from the cylinder and jam the gun. The even-lighter S&W J-frames require the use of jacketed ammunition to prevent this. I tried an "experiment" using lead factory ammunition to see how true this proviso might be; I fired 4 shots before the revolver jammed as described above. It's my observation that the aluminum J-frames are light enough, but getting a grip on them can be a problem. I find the factory standard rubber boot grip that comes on them to be the overall choice.

Subjectively my choices for "best" are:

· Uncle Mike's rubber boot grip

· S&W checkered service grip w/grip adapter

· Eagle Grips' checkered Secret Service

Again, my choices may not be yours and I certainly would not argue with anyone preferring to buy the original Spegel's from which the Uncle Mike's were derived. If pocket carry is your preferred manner of carry, I do suggest going with grips that do not cover the rear grip strap, are not thicker than the original grips, and do not extend below the frame.

The J is not the most efficient defense gun by a long shot, but it does offer at least reasonableeasily carried that it is more likely to be with terminal ballistics with appropriate loads and is so us when the unexpected occurs.

Were I going to use the J-frame snub only at the range or home, I'd go with the Fitz Gunfighters…if I could find them. Despite the dated appearance, they do offer very fine control and tame recoil well. This might be the case for a person having but one handgun, but if the gun's grips are making it too much larger, it's original niche is lost.

This S&W 3" barrel Model 64 is all stainless steel. It weighs significantly more than the J-frame Airweight, but offers six shots instead of five. Felt recoil is substantially reduced. This extra inch of barrel significantly increases velocity. With these Pachmayr "Compac Professional's", its grip dimensions have not been significantly increased. They are very flat, but do extend below the grip frame approximately 1/4". So far I have not found any grip more convenient and comfortable with this K-frame revolver. Before going to a K-size grip on a J-frame, I would go to the K-frame and its advantages if concealability is not an issue.

This well-worn S&W Model 642 wears the same Uncle Mike's grips it came with. I've tried quite a few others but always came back to these. This revolver is carried in a pocket holster and on me 24/7.

It remains my belief that the J-frame remains a fine choice for concealed carry or back up use. I've also found there to be significant differences in control and comfort depending upon the grips in a handgun this size. Hopefully, this article might be of use to someone fancying a J but wondering about grip selection for concealed carry or just more controllability.

Choose wisely.

..............................................................................................................
CRIMSON TRACE LASER GRIP

LG-105 Defender Series For S&W J-Frame

Fits Models:
Airlight, Airweight, Bodyguard, Chiefs Special, Centennial, Ladysmith, models 36, 37, 38, 49, 60, 63, 317, 331, 332, 337, 340, 342, 351, 360, 442, 637, 638, 640, 642, 649, 651 and 940 with round-butt J-Frame.

..............................................................................................................

MUST SEE VIDEO - GUN CONFISCATION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

INTERESTING VIDEOS TO SEE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVfwFP_RwTQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Va1TXGSCXk


www.mybenefitsplus.com/jjacobson

www.actionsbyt.com

www.commentsbyt.blogspot.com

www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com

www.tacticalknives.blogspot.com

www.actionsbyt.typepad.com

www.actionsbyt.wordpress.com

www.tjofsugarland.blogspot.com


www.nicindustries.com

http://www.spw-duf.info/links.html#guns

www.hipowersandhandguns.com


www.mouseguns.com

http://www.sequiam.com/products/

http://www.flashlightreviews.com/index1.html

http://www.shootersolutions.com/teddyjacobson.html

www.crimsontrace.com

http://www.gunsmithforum.com/


www.militec-1.com

http://www.magpul.com/

www.ismi-gunsprings.com

www.wolffgunsprings.com


www.trippresearch.com

www.cdnninvestments.com

www.survivalblog.com

www.lightningarms.com

www.brownells.com

www.ammoman.com

www.mscdirect.com

http://www.midwayusa.com/

www.coldsteel.com


www.davidstahr.com

www.wowtexas.com


www.jtf.org

http://gogumogog.com/


www.kolisrael.com


www.rabbiyess.com

http://yearsofawe.blogspot.com/

www.thetrumpet.com

www.worldnetdaily.com

www.michaelsavage.com

http://www.secretarmies.com/links.html


www.staceydean.org

www.brightguy.com

www.ufowatchdog.com

www.whatreallyhappened.com


..........................................................................................................................
SELLOUT OF AMERICA - GIULIANI NOT MY CHOICE

PREMEDITATED MERGER
Rudy Giuliani tied to 'superhighways'
Law firm represents consortia funding NAFTA-related routes


Posted: May 15, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


Rudy Giuliani

Questions are being raised over Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani's policy on terrorism, after a report revealed he has strong ties to two foreign investment consortia working to own or lease U.S. toll roads, including the Trans-Texas Corridor 35, which is identified as part of the I-35 "NAFTA Superhighway."

Although he opposed NAFTA in 1993, Giuliani recently declined to call for building a fence on the United States border with Mexico, and he has supported a guest-worker program.

Columnist Michelle Malkin also has documented that while mayor of New York City, Giuliani kept the municipality a sanctuary city for illegal aliens, adhering to a policy first established by Mayor Ed Koch in 1989.

Now comes a new report about Giuliani's involvement with public-private-partnership projects that include NAFTA Superhighway funding and his open borders record on immigration questions, all of which could undermine his otherwise tough policy on terrorism that has resulted from the 9/11 role Giuliani played in managing New York City's response to the attacks on the World Trade Center.

Giuliani's Houston-based law firm, Bracewell & Giuliani, is identified by the Texas Department of Transportation as the sole law firm representing Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., the Spanish investment consortium that has joined with Zachry Construction Company in San Antonio on the TTC project.

WND previously reported that TTC-35 is the new four-football-fields-wide car-truck-train-pipeline corridor to be built parallel to the existing I-35 as the Texas segment of the emerging Mexico-to-Canada I-35 NAFTA Superhighway.

Bracewell & Giuliani also has advised Cintra on the completion of the Comprehensive Development Agreement negotiated with Texas to develop State Highway 121 into a toll road through Collin and Denton counties.

The state highway department also gave Cintra a 50-year concession to operate SH 121 as a toll road, with Cintra agreeing to pay $2.1 billion upfront and annual lease payments totaling $700 million.

In addition, Bracewell & Giuliani successfully negotiated a $1.3 billion deal with TxDOT for Cintra-Zachry to build the remaining 40 miles of State Highway 130 as a toll road.

WND also has reported that Giuliani Capital Advisors was acquired in March by Macquarie, an Australian investment consortium which has also been involved in leasing and operating U.S. toll roads.

Further, the Federal Highway Administration has created a public-private-partnerships website on which both Cintra and Macquarie are featured as joint venture partners in the 2005 deal involving $1.83 billion paid to the City of Chicago to operate the Chicago Skyway under a 99-year lease.

The FHWA website also discloses that Cintra and Macquarie partnered in the $3.85 billion 2006 deal to operate the Indiana Toll Road on a 75-year lease.

WND has previously reported EuroMoney Seminars, a UK-based company, is holding seminars to teach state and local governments in the U.S. how to lease a wide range of public assets – from highways to water departments, to prisons and schools – to international and foreign investment groups.

Just this month, independent journalist Diane Grassi first broke the story of Giuliani's involvement with the NAFTA Superhighway, writing that, "All negotiations for Cintra were and are presently handled by the law firm, Bracewell & Giuliani, LLP, of which Republican Presidential candidate, Rudolph Giuliani, has been a senior executive partner since March 2005. His law firm is the exclusive legal counsel for Cintra."

The New York Sun also earlier reported that an October 2002 contract between Mexico City and Giuliani Partners, a Giuliani consulting firm, to reduce crime was a failure.

Giuliani began the project in January 2003 with a fanfare initial tour of Mexico City that included a motorcade of a dozen bulletproof SUVs, 400 officers, and a helicopter.

Still, the Sun reported that Giuliani Partners ended up being paid less than the full $4.3 million contract price tag, despite some 20 trips to Mexico City booked by Giuliani associates over a 10-month period.

In December 2004, Bernard Kerik, the former New York City police commissioner, resigned as CEO of Giuliani-Kerik, a law enforcement-oriented subsidiary of Giuliani Partners, amidst the various scandals that developed following Kerik's nomination by President Bush to head the Department of Homeland Security.

Monday, May 14, 2007

Springfield Armory Mil-Spec 1911

Springfield Armory Mil-Spec "Progress Report"

By Stephen Camp

www.hipowersandhandguns.com

Since I wrote "A Critical Look at the Springfield Armory Mil-Spec" in January 2005, many more rounds have flown downrange and I thought that it might be of interest on how the pistol has held up and any problems. (That article is in this section of the site for those interested.)

The pistol worked fine as it came from the factory, but had a less-than-stellar trigger pull and the hammer spur nipped me regularly. I bobbed the hammer and eliminated that and also used a Pachmayr drop-in grip safety to eliminate the wear and tear caused by the sharp edges of the factory grip safety. Not happy with that set up, I eventually rounded the edges of the factory GI-type grip safety and this pretty well solved the problem.

I find that with the rounded GI grip safety and a slightly shortened spur hammer, I can comfortably shoot the pistol about 200 full-power loads without problems. I much prefer the wide grip safety, but wanted at least one 1911-pattern pistol that somewhat resembled the unmodified 1911 stalwart. (Some seem to think that because they have no problems with the GI type grip safety, no one else should either. Frequently, comments like, "If beavertails were needed, John Browning would have put them on the gun," and other such information-filled eloquent pearls of …crap. Different folks find that different things work for them and if you are one better served with the wide grip safety, go for it. If the standard type works fine for you, great, but I submit that it is up to the individual user to make the decision.)

Not readily visible from the outside, this Mil-Spec's internal parts have been replaced with upgraded ones done by trigger specialist, Teddy Jacobson. This "hidden" work has resulted in a very good 1911 pattern pistol and one that I would absolutely trust in a serious situation.

Even though the pistol was working fine and in stock condition, I did upgrade the internal parts with those supplied by trigger specialist, Teddy Jacobson of Actions by T. The trigger was initially just shy of about 5-lbs, with the break being both crisp and clean. It settled in at about 4 1/2-lbs and has stayed there. The gun was equipped with a steel firing pin as well, but the slide stop and single-side thumb safety have been left alone. The wide EMC spur hammer he provided is finely checkered and has been bobbed and recontoured to eliminate hammer bite.

I kept the factory short trigger, but smoothed it up. I also replaced the mainspring housing for another arched one that I already had. It has no lock and standard size parts work in it. Though not at all necessary, I replaced the checkered plastic stocks that came with the pistol for a set I simply think looks better while still offering a secure grip.

This Mil-Spec .45 auto has proven itself utterly reliable with a wide selection of bullet types and is one I trust for "serious matters."

I have not kept an exact round count, but it is in excess of 4K as this is written. Most of these have been either 200-gr. CSWC handloads at about 870 ft/sec or 230-gr. CFP and CRN at roughly 840 ft/sec. It has also gobbled up several hundred 230-gr. Federal HydraShoks, Golden Sabers, Gold Dots, Ranger JHP's, and ball rounds.

With any full-power load, it has had zero malfunctions, not one. There have been no failures to extract or eject and the slide stop consistently locks back when the last shot's fired and not before.

The sights on this gun are as they came from the factory. They were properly regulated and I've seen no reason to change them.

Slide-to-frame fit both vertical and horizontal has very, very little "slop." The barrel-to-slide fit has remained solid as a rock, with wear marks evenly distributed on the rear edge of the barrel hood. I have no intentions of changing either the factory barrel or bushing as the gun groups very nicely as is.

The pistol's parkerized finish is holding up nicely, though a ding or two is now present.

Wear marks are not excessive and evenly distributed on both sets of slide rails.

It is my understanding that the Mil-Spec is not so easy to find as in the recent past. I do not know if that is because gun dealers sell them as fast as they get them or if SA is focusing on other models, or what, but if you want a relatively inexpensive no frills 1911-pattern .45, I would give these a long and hard look.

I own several 1911 pistols, most being more costly than the Mil-Spec, but I trust none of them more than I do this one.

This Mil-Spec has proven itself to me. It groups adequately and has demonstrated extreme reliability while being essentially a "basic" type 1911 pattern pistol. The 9mm/38 Super firing pin used has presented no problems with either breakage or firing. The gun runs on everything I've tried with the exception of a very light target SWC that was loaded too lightly for the gun's standard power ISMI 16-lb recoil spring. All standard pressure and +P loads have worked flawlessly.

Four thousand full power loads are certainly not that many compared to what more than a few serious shooters crank off in a year's time. I think that they've been enough to prove to me (at least) that the old saw that a 1911 has to cost thousands to be reliable is pretty much false…but many already know that.

Do I believe that all Mil-Specs will run flawlessly out of the box? Nope, but the last 5 or 6 I have seen sure have. With the immense continuing popularity of John Browning's enduring design, factories crank them out as fast as they can and some that shouldn't have got past quality control simply do. It is not right, but such seems to be the case. That said, I believe that the Mil-Spec is a very, very fine choice for folks wanting a quality 1911 without breaking the bank.

A gun does not have to be ultra-expensive to be special. I would not hesitate to use this one in a fight if required. When I carry a 1911 for self-protection, it is almost always this one.

................................................................................................................

MUST SEE VIDEO - GUN CONFISCATION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

INTERESTING VIDEOS TO SEE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVfwFP_RwTQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Va1TXGSCXk


www.mybenefitsplus.com/jjacobson

www.actionsbyt.com

www.commentsbyt.blogspot.com

www.truthaboutparts.blogspot.com

www.tacticalknives.blogspot.com

www.actionsbyt.typepad.com

www.actionsbyt.wordpress.com

www.tjofsugarland.blogspot.com


www.nicindustries.com

http://www.spw-duf.info/links.html#guns

www.hipowersandhandguns.com


www.mouseguns.com

http://www.sequiam.com/products/

http://www.flashlightreviews.com/index1.html

http://www.shootersolutions.com/teddyjacobson.html

www.crimsontrace.com

http://www.gunsmithforum.com/


www.militec-1.com

http://www.magpul.com/

www.ismi-gunsprings.com

www.wolffgunsprings.com


www.trippresearch.com

www.cdnninvestments.com

www.survivalblog.com

www.lightningarms.com

www.brownells.com

www.ammoman.com

www.mscdirect.com

http://www.midwayusa.com/

www.coldsteel.com


www.davidstahr.com

www.wowtexas.com


www.jtf.org

http://gogumogog.com/


www.kolisrael.com


www.rabbiyess.com

http://yearsofawe.blogspot.com/

www.thetrumpet.com

www.worldnetdaily.com

www.michaelsavage.com

http://www.secretarmies.com/links.html


www.staceydean.org

www.ufowatchdog.com

www.whatreallyhappened.com

www.brightguy.com